Loading
No-code voice agents
No-code gets you to a first agent quickly. The ceiling arrives sooner than most teams expect.
First, the fair part
Synthflow is approachable and you can get something live without engineers. For simple, stable use cases that is a real advantage.
Where teams hit the wall
Real qualification logic has conditions, exceptions and fallbacks. Visual builders handle the first two layers and get unwieldy at the third.
No-code means one person on your team now maintains it on top of their actual job, and the agent degrades when they are busy or leave.
If your practice software or CRM is not on it, you are building a bridge anyway, which was the thing no-code was meant to avoid.
The actual difference
There is no ceiling on our side because there is no builder. If your process needs it, we write it. And nobody on your team has to maintain it.
| Synthflow | Shielva Sense | |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first agent | Fast | About a week, but it is production-ready at the end of it |
| Logic complexity | Limited by the builder | Whatever your process actually requires |
| Integrations | Supported list | Anything with an API |
| Who maintains it | Someone on your team | Us |
| Best fit | Simple, stable use cases with an internal owner | Businesses where the process has real edge cases |
How it goes
The total demand on your time from first call to live agent is about ninety minutes. That is the whole point of paying somebody to do this rather than buying a tool and doing it yourself.
One call. What gets asked on the phone, what a good lead sounds like, which questions you are tired of answering, where bookings live.
Agent design, the telephony, the number, the prompts, the guardrails, the CRM and calendar wiring, the escalation path to a human. All of it on our side.
We hand you real recordings from a test line, not a slide. You tell us where it sounds off and we fix it before a single customer hears it.
We watch the transcripts, catch the questions it fumbled, and tighten it every week. When something breaks at 2am it pages us, not you.
FAQ
Both, depending on what fits. We are not religious about the underlying provider. We pick per project and tell you what we picked and why. What you are buying from us is the build and the running of it, not a licence.
That is a common starting point. We audit what exists, keep whatever is worth keeping, and rebuild the parts that are not holding up. You are not obliged to throw work away.
Yes. Prompts, call flows, integrations and configuration are yours, and we will hand them over if you leave. We do not hold your agent hostage.
Book a free call
Tell us what you are trying to do. If Synthflow is the better buy for your case, we will say so on the call.
We will not put you on a nurture sequence. If it is not a fit we say so and that is the end of it.